research article

Filamentous Fungi inSelectedProcessed Indigenous Flours Soldin, Kumasi, Ghana

Benjamin Tetteh Awaitey1, Felix CMills-Robertson2*

 1DepartmentofFoodScienceandTechnology,KwameNkrumahUniversity ofScienceandTechnology, Kumasi, Ghana

2DepartmentofBiochemistry andBiotechnology,KwameNkrumahUniversity ofScienceand Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

 *Corresponding author:Felix C Mills-Robertson, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana. Tel: +233208970091; Email: mirobfc2011@gmail.com

 Received Date:11August, 2017; Accepted Date: 16 September, 2017; Published Date: 22 September, 2017

Citation:Awaitey BT, Milk-Robertson FC (2017) Filamentous Fungi in Selected Processed Indigenous Flours Sold in, Kumasi, Ghana. Food Nutr J: FDNJ-146DOI: 10.29011/2575-7091. 100046


1.      Abstract

This studevaluated the filamentous fungi present inselected localprocessed indigenous flour sold in the Kumasi Metropolisof Ghana usingstandard microbiologicalmethods.Resultsfrom thisstudy showedthatdrycassava(kokonte)flourrecordedmouldcountrangingfrom1.70×103±0.15cfu/gto4.03×105±0.35cfu/gwhilemaizeflourhadmouldcountrangingfromno observablegrowthcountto1.18×106±0.18cfu/g.Totalplatecountshowedcontamination levelsbetweennoobservablegrowthcountto9.1×106±0.25cfu/gforthe maizefloursamples, whileforthedrycassava(kokonte)flour,countsrangedfrom7.8×103±0.30cfu/gto4.64×106± 3.18 cfu/g. Moistureanalysis revealed percentagemoisture content of 12.4%±0.15 to 19.7% ± 0.12forthemaizefloursamplesand10.9%±0.27to16.9%±0.56fordry cassava(kokonte) flour.Coliformstestindicatednegativeforsevenofeight(7/8)maizefloursamplesandsixout ofeight(6/8)fordry cassava (kokonte)floursamplesboughtfromthevariousmarkets.Fromthe study,thirteenmouldspeciesbelongingtofivegenerawere isolated fromthevariousflour samples.Tendifferentspecies were isolatedfromthedry cassava(kokonte)flourwhilethirteen different varieties from the five generawereisolated from the maize flour.

 Keywords:Moulds;Dry Cassava (Kokonte) Flour;MaizeFlour

1.      Introduction

Thehighincidenceofpost-harvestfoodlosses,arisingmainlyduetoinadequatefoodstorage andpreservationtechnologies,isamajorissueaffectingthequalityoffoodinWestAfrica, whereseasonalfoodshortagesanddiseasesresultingfromnutritionaldeficiency arestillamajor concern[1].Studyhasshownthatfruits,vegetables,rootsandtuberscontributetonearly50%of perishablefood commoditieswhile grainssuchasmaize,sorghum,millet,riceandcowpeas contributetoabout30%offoodlossafterharvestinWestAfrica[1].Factorsthatcontributeto theselossesmay include;inappropriatefoodprocessingtechnologies,poorharvestingand inefficientpost-harvesthandlingpractices,badroads,moribundrailsystemsandmanyothers [1].

InGhana,issuesofpost-harvestlossesarepredominantespecially wherelocally producedcrops suchascassava,yam,maize,rice,beans,andothersarehardlyprocessedleadingtowasteof cropsespecially duringbumperharvest.Inordertoextendtheshelf-lifeofsomeofthesecrops andhencereducetheincidenceofpostharvestlosses,they areprocessedintofloursandother productswhichmaybeusedby individualsathomeorsoldoncommercialbasis.Methods involvedinprocessingthese indigenousfoodstuffsmay,however,exposethemtocontamination by severalpathogensmainlyfilamentousfungiandsomebacteriainadditiontocontamination from thefarm beforeprocessing. Forinstance, most cereal grains can becontaminated by differentspeciesofmicroscopic fungusduringitdevelopmentalstages[2]andthese pathogens mayaffect thecrop resulting in a reduction ofthequalityof thegrain.

Somespeciesmay producemycotoxinsthatintoxicatebothhumansandanimalupon consumption[2].Mycotoxinclassesknownto occur incereals,includingtheaflatoxins(AFB1, AFB2andAFG1,G2),tricotecens,deoxinivalenol(DON)and(T-2toxin),the fumonisins(FB1, FB2andFB3),thezearalenone(ZON),ochratoxinA(OTA)andtheergotalkaloids[3]are knowntobecarcinogenic.Studieshaverevealedthatmajority ofthesemycotoxinsareproduced bythe genuses Aspergillus, Penicilliumand Fusariu[3].

 Sporesproducedby thesefungiareverydifficulttoeliminateduetotheirstabilitytohigh temperature and other harsh environmental conditions, hencethe presenceofthesespores in food poses threattothehealthofconsumers.Inthecase offlour,thehigh-gradetypesare treatedto containverylowornocontaminationduetouseofadvancetechnologies[4].However,locally processedindigenousfloursmay becontaminatedby differentmicrobesduetoimproperfood safety practicesandasthesefloursareusuallysoldoncommercialbasis,they may resultin exposing consumers to several health risks.

 The purposeofthisstudy,therefore,wastoevaluatethefilamentousfungiofsomeselected processed indigenousflours sold in Kumasiin Ghana.

 2.      Materialsand Methods

 2.1.  Experimental design

 Twotypesofprocessedindigenousflourswere consideredfor thisstudy;maizeflouranddry cassava(kokonte)flour.Thesetwoflourswereconsideredforthestudybecausethey arevery commonandfrequently usedinfood preparationinGhana.Sixteensamples(eightofeachflour) were selected for this study from four different markets (Ayigya market, Central market, Bantama marketandAtonsumarket)inKumasi.Foreachmarket,twoVendorswere selectedat randomfor samplecollectionandadministrationof questionnairesandfromeachVendor three samplewere bought.Sampleswere packagedintosterilesamplebagsandbroughttothe laboratory foranalysis.Sampleswereanalyzedonthesameday theywereboughtfromthe market,butthosethatwerenotanalyzedsamedaywerestoredintherefrigeratorat4°C. Sampleswereanalyzed inbatches,foursamplesperbatch.Twosamples(maizeflourand kokonteflour) werealsoprocessed in thelaboratoryto serveascontrols.

 2.2.  MoistureContent Analysis

 Two(2) gramsample wasweighedintoa Petridishandplacedinanovenat130°Cfor 2hours, weighingintermittentlyuntiltherewasnochangeinweight[5].Thesampleswerecooledto roomtemperatureina desiccator at eachtimebeforeweighing.The moisturecontentwas express as; (Weightloss/initial weight of flour)x100%

 2.3.  Microbial Sample Preparation

 Workingunderasepticcondition,tengrams(10 g)ofeachsamplewasweighedusingasterile weighingboatandtransferredtosterilesamplebottlescontaining90mLsterilepeptonewater [3].Eachsamplewasvortexedforabout1minuteatmoderatespeedandseriallydilutedto make fivedilutions(10-1-10-5)bytransferring1mLhomogenizedsampleto9mLdilutionblank, mixingwelluntilthe10-5dilutionwasobtained.Aliquots(0.1mL)ofthesedilutionswereused forthe study.

 2.4.  MicrobialEnumeration

 Spreadplate methodof inoculationwasemployedinthe microbialexaminationof the samples. Fromtheprepared10-foldserialdilutions,enumerationofmouldswerecarriedoutbythespread platemethodonPotatoDextroseAgarcontaining100mg/L ofchloramphenicoland50mg/L Oxytetracyclinetosuppressthegrowthofbacteria[3].Theplateswereincubatedat25°Cfor5 to7days.Aftertheappropriateincubationperiods,dilutions with20-200 colonieswereselected andmanually counted.Thenumberofcolony-formingunitspergram(cfu/g)ofsampleswas calculated bymultiplyingthe number oforganisms bythe dilution factor.

 2.5.  IsolationandIdentificationofMoulds

Threedifferentmediaforthecultivationoffungi; PotatoDextroseAgar(PDA),Oxytetracycline- GlucoseYeastExtractAgar(OGY)andDichloranRoseBengalChlortetracyclineAgar(DRBC) (eachcontaining100mg/L ofchloramphenicol)wereusedfortheisolationofthemoulds.From theprepareddilutions,0.1mloftheinoculumwasinoculatedontothedifferentmediaby the spread platemethod andthe plates incubatedat 25°Cfor5 to 7 days.

 2.6.  IdentificationofMoulds

 Mould cultures were prepared by lifting the mycelia mat of the organism with a sterile inoculationpinintoa dropof lactophenolblueona slideteased(spreadingthemat)andcovered withacover-slip andobservedunderamicroscope.Different characteristicfeaturesofthe isolatedorganismwereobservedandused intheiridentificationusingthefourtheditionof introduction to foodborne fungi [6].

 2.7.  Total PlateCount

 Spreadplatemethodofinoculationwasusedtodeterminethetotalplatecountoforganismsin thesamples.Fromthepreparedserialdilutions,enumerationwascarriedoutby thespreadplate methodonPlateCount Agar.Theplateswereincubatedat37°Cfor24hours.Afterthe appropriateincubation,plateswith30-300colonieswereselectedandmanually counted.The numberofcolony-formingunitspergram(cfu/g)ofsampleswascalculatedby multiplyingthe numberof organisms bythe dilution factor.

 2.8.  ColiformCount

 SterileMacConkey brothwas preparedintesttubesforthecultivationofcoliforms.Fromthe preparedserialdilution,1mLofinoculumfromthe1:10dilution(10-1)wastransferredinto9 mL ofMacConkey brothunderasepticcondition.Incubationwasdoneat37°Cfor24hoursand test tubes which showedchangein mediacolour from red toyellow wererecordedas positive.

 2.9.  Statistical analysis

Analysiswasdone intriplicatesinorder tominimize the error marginasmuch aspossible. ResultsobtainedweretabulatedintoMicrosoftExcel2010andforeasy interpretation,thedata was subjected to one-wayAnalysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the significance differences betweenthemeansofthevariousmarketsdetermined by usingStatisticalPackageforSocial Sciences (SPSSversion 20). P-values 0.05 were considered as statisticallynot significant.

 3.      Resultsand Discussion

 3.1.  Moisture content ofthesample

Theaveragemoisturecontentofthemaizefloursamplesrangedfrom12.37%±0.15to19.70% ±0.12whilethatofcassavaflourrangedfrom10.93%±0.27to16.90%±0.56asshownin Table1.Themoisturecontentobtainedforthevariouskokontefloursamplesisinagreement withthestudy result(10.0%to16.9%)reported byLokko,(1978).Severalresearcheshavebeen conducted toestablishanacceptablemoisturecontentofkokonteflour. Reportsshow thatfora kokonteflour toremainstable,a moisture contentof 12% isrequired[7].Apartfromsamples bought from Atonso market (AtmKF1 andAtm KF2) and thecontrol (CKF) which recorded valueslowerthan12%,theremainingsampleshadmoisturecontents higher than12%.This suggeststhatthehighmoisturecontentmay beacontributoryfactortomicrobialcontamination sincestudieshaveshownthatmicroorganismsrequiremoisturefortheirgrowth[8]. Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between moisture content and mould count of dry cassava(kokonte) flour.Thoughhighmoisturecontentinfoodsisknowntobe a stronginfluence for growthofmicroorganisms,theresultsforthemoisture contentofAtmKF1,AtmKF2and CKFfromthisstudysuggestthatotherfactorsapartfromthehighmoisturecontentmay account forthe contamination in the samples.

3.2.  EnumerationofMoulds

Resultsfor theenumerationofmouldsinthesampleshavebeenrepresentedinTable2.Forthe dry cassava(kokonte)flour,allthesampleswerecontaminatedwithmoulds,representing100% mouldscontamination,butthelevelsofcontaminationvariedamongthesamples.The levelofmouldcontaminationamongthesamplesexceededtheacceptablemouldslevelinfood(103cfu/g)asreportedby AfricanOrganizationfor Standardization[9].Thisis anindicationthatthe drycassava(kokonte)floursoldonthevariousmarketsmaybeunwholesomeand,therefore, pose healthrisktoconsumers.Incomparingtheresultsfor mouldcountinthe variouskokonteflour,withresultsobtainedbyLuetal.[10],all the samplesrecordedcounthigher than6.5×103cfu/gasthey reportedintheirstudiesexceptforthesamplesfromVendor-2inBantamamarket (BmKF2)whichrecorded1.70×103±0.15cfu/g.The controlsamplealsorecordedcountlower than reported. Statisticalanalysisshoweda significantdifference betweenthe countsatp<0.05. Enumerationofmouldsinthe maize floursamplesrevealedvaryingdegree ofcontamination among thesamplesranging from no observablemould count as recorded byAtm MF1, BmMF1, BmMF2andCMFtohighcountof1.18×106±0.18cfu/gasrecordedby CmMF1.Samples fromAymMF2,CmMF2andAtmMF2showedcountsthatwerealittlehigherthanthe tolerablelevelof103cfu/g,recording1.67×103±0.30cfu/g,3.40×103±0.30cfu/gand2.97× 103±0.30cfu/g,respectively.Extremelylowcountsofmouldinthesamplesasrecordedby AtmMF1, BmMF1, BmMF2and CMFis inagreementwithresultsobtained byAdu-Gyamfi andAppiah[11],obtainingmouldcountof5.0×101cfu/g.Thelowcountofmouldsreported may beduetothedehullingofgrainsbeforeprocessingintoflourasreportedbyVictoretal.[12].Itisthoughtthatthemicroorganismsareusually foundontheoutercoatofthegrainsand hencedehullingisameansofreducingcontamination.Theextentofcontaminationinsamples for Aym MF1 and Cm MF1, however, suggests that the dehulling process may not be a guaranteethatsamplesareabsolutely freefromcontaminants.Thehighincidenceof contaminationinthesesamplesmay beattributedtofactorssuchasthehighmoisturecontentof thefloursamples,thelength/periodthesampleshavebeenonmarket,theprocessingmethod,the hygienic practices employed in processing, and the conditions under which the food commodities weresold on the market.

3.3.  Identificationofmoulds

Mouldsbelongingtofivegenera wereisolatedandidentifiedfromboth themaizeflourandthe dry cassava(kokonte)flour.Thedifferent generaincludedCladosporium,Aspergillus,Mucor, RhizopusandPenicillium(Figure 1).Tables3and4,showthedifferentorganismsisolatedfrom thevariousfloursamplesfromthedifferentmarkets.Thesefindingsarecontrary tothatofLuet al.,[10]whoisolatedonly two genera;AspergillusandPenicilliumfromtheirsamples.Themost predominantorganisms isolatedfromthedry cassava(kokonte)flourwereAspergillusflavus, RhizopusstoloniferandMucorhiemaliswhilethatforthemaize flour werePenicillium crustosum,Rhizopusstolonifer,CladosporiumcladosporioidesandAspergilluswentii. The prevalenceoftheseorganismsinthevariousfloursamplesmaybeduetotheubiquitousnature oftheirsporesasmentionedbyOGormanetal.[13].Studieshaveshownthatsomeofthese mouldsproducemycotoxinswhichare knowntobeteratogenic,mutagenic,hepatotoxic, genotoxicandhepatocarcinogenicdependingonhowlonganindividualgetsexposedtothe toxin [14].

3.4.  Total Plate count

Resultsfromthetotal platecountisanimportantindicationofthehygienicconditions surrounding the foodandalso shows theeffectiveness andefficiencyofthefood chain process as wellas the shelf lifeof the food[12].In this study,the total plate countfrom thekokontesamples werehigher(Table5)thanthatreportedbyLuetal. [10]whorecorded16×103cfu/g.Only samplesfromVendor-2inBantama market(BmKF2)andthe ControlKokonteFlour (CKF) recording7.8×103±0.30cfu/gand5.63×103±0.45cfu/g,respectively,werealittle lowerthan theresultsobtained byLuetal.[10]. Formostofthesamples,thelevelofcontaminationwas foundtobehigherthantherecommendedlevel(105cfu/g)andthisisanindicationofpoor sanitationorproblemsresultingfromtheprocesscontrolorhandlingoftherawmaterial[12]. Forthemaizefloursamples,exceptforsamplesfromBantamamarketVendor-1(BmMF1) whichdidnotrecordany growthfortotalplatecount,theremainingsamplesrecordedcounts whichexceededthe tolerable level.Thisisanindicationthatfavourable conditionsexistwithin the flour to support thegrowth of various organisms.

3.5.  ColiformCount

Mostof the samplestestednegative for coliformsexceptfor maize floursample boughtfrom Vendor-2fromAtonsomarket(AtmMF2),dry cassava (kokonte)flour boughtfromtheCentral market Vendor-1(Cm KF1) andkokonteflourbought from Vendor-1(Bm KF1) (Table 6). Resultsfromcoliformtest,whichisanindicatorof personalhygienelevelof flour sellers[12], suggestthatthehighlevelofcontaminationmaynotnecessarily beasaresultofpoorhygiene practices by floursellersbutotherfactorssuchascontaminationduringharvestandstorageof cereal as mentioned byVictor et al.[12].

4.      Conclusion

 The studiesrevealedthatmostoftheflour sampleshadhighmoisture contentandthelevelof mouldcountandtotalmesophilicmicrobe presentintheflourexceededthetolerablelevel indicating that consumers maybeat health risk upon consumption ofthesesamples.


MARKETS

FLOUR SAMPLES

Aym

Cm

Atm

Bm

Control

MF1

15.07±0.19c

14.03±0.18b

13.87±0.12b

13.23±0.09ab

12.37±0.15a

MF2

13.33±0.37ab

19.70±0.12d

13.10±0.25ab

15.50±0.15c

 

KF1

12.57±0.34b

14.67±0.23c

10.93±0.27a

15.00±0.06c

11.70±0.17a

KF2

13.03±0.29b

16.90±0.56d

11.03±0.23a

13.00±0.15b

 

Key:Aym - Ayigya market, Cm - Central market, Atm - Atonso market, Bm - Bantama market, CMF - Control Maize Flour, KF- kokonte flour, MF- maize flour, C-control sample, 1 and 2 - Vendors 1 and 2 from the same market. For the same flour sample, means that do not share the same letter (superscript) were significantly different (P<0.05) but those that share the same letter (superscript) do not differ significantly (P>0.05)

Table 1: Percentage Moisture Contents of the Maize and Cassava Flour samples.

 

MARKETS

FLOUR SAMPLES

Aym

Cm

Atm

Bm

Control

MF1

3.03×105±0.96a

1.18×106±0.18b

NILa

NILa

NILa

MF2

1.67×103±0.30a

3.40×103±0.17a

2.97×103±0.30a

NILa

 

KF1

1.08×104±0.25c

3.20×104±0.32c

1.77×104±0.18c

1.43×104±0.18c

TFTC

KF2

1.90×105±0.25d

4.03×105±0.35e

7.03×104±0.61c

1.70×103±0.15c

 

Key: TFTC- Too Few to Count, NIL – No mould count. Aym - Ayigya market, Cm - Central market, Atm - Atonso market, Bm - Bantama market, CMF - Control Maize Flour, KF- kokonte flour, MF- maize flour, C-control sample, 1 and 2 - Vendors 1 and 2 from the same market. For the same flour sample, means that do not share the same letter (superscript) were significantly different (P<0.05) but those that share the same letter (superscript) do not differ significantly (P>0.05)

Table 2: Load of Moulds on the Samples (cfu/g).

 

 

FLOUR SAMPLE

ORGANISM ISOLATED

Aym MF1

Mucor racemosis, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus wentii, Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus versicolor, Cladosporium herbarum, Penicillium crustosum, Penicillium camemberti

Aym MF2

Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus wentii, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Penicillium crustosum

Cm MF1

Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium crustosum, Mucor racemosis,

Cm MF2

Aspergillus flavus, Rhizopus stolonifer, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus wentii,

Atm MF1

No observable growth recorded

Atm MF2

Mucor hiemalis, Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium crustosum, Penicillium viridicatum

Bm MF1

No observable growth recorded

Bm MF2

No observable growth recorded

CMF

No observable growth recorded

Key: Aym MF1-maize flour from vendor 1 at Ayigya market, Aym MF2- maize flour from vendor 2 at Ayigya market, Cm MF1-maize flour from vendor1 at central market, Cm MF2-maize flour from vendor2 at central market, Atm MF1- maize flour from vendor1 at Atonso market, Atm MF2- maize flour form vendor2 at Atonso market, Bm MF1- maize flour from vendor 1 at Bantama market, Bm MF2- maize flour from vendor 2 at Bantama Market, CMF- control maize flour.

Table 3: Identified Moulds on the Maize Flour from the Different Markets.

 

 

FLOUR SAMPLE

ORGANISM ISOLATED

Aym KF1

Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus wentii

Aym KF2

Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium crustosum, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus wentii

Cm KF1

Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium crustosum, Cladosporium cladosporioides

Cm KF2

Rhizopus stolonifer, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus wentii, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor racemosis,

Atm KF1

Aspergillus flavus, Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucor hiemalis, Penicillium viridicatum

Atm KF2

Aspergillus flavus, Mucor racemosis, Mucor hiemalis, Rhizopus stolonifer

Bm KF1

Mucor hiemalis, Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium viridicatum, Aspergillus versicolor, Aspergillus fumigatus

Bm KF2

Aspergillus fumigatus, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor racemosis Rhizopus stolonifer

CKF

Cladosporium cladosporioides, Penicillium crustosum,

Key: Aym KF1-kokonte flour from vendor 1 at Ayigya market, Aym KF2- kokonte flour from vendor 2 at Ayigya market, Cm KF1-kokonte flour from vendor1 at Central market, Cm KF2-kokonte flour from vendor 2 at Central market, Atm KF1- kokonte flour from vendor1 at Atonso market, Atm KF2- kokonte flour form vendor 2 at Atonso market, Bm KF1- kokonte flour from vendor 1 at Bantama market, Bm KF2- kokonte flour from vendor 2 at Bantama market, CKF- control kokonte flour

Table 4: Identified Moulds on the Dry Cassava (kokonte) Flour from the Different Markets.

 

 

MARKET

FLOUR SAMPLE

Aym

Cm

Atm

Bm

Control

MF1

5.5 ×104±0.62a

4.02 ×105±3.05a,b

3.4 ×103±0.62a

NILa

4.37×103±0.83a

MF2

6.4×105±0.30a,b

8.7 ×104±0 .96a

9.1 ×106±0.25c

3.42×106±2.52b

 

KF1

3.3×106±2.41e

6.4 ×105±0.78e

4.43 ×106±3.03e

4.33 ×105±3.35e

5.63 ×103±0.45e

KF2

4.6 ×105±0.62e

4.64 ×106±3.18e

3.76 ×106±2.69e

7.8 ×103±0.30

 

Table 5: Total Plate Count (cfu/g) of Organisms Isolated from Both Flour Samples.

 

 

Sample

Test result

Sample

Test results

Aym MF1

Negative

Aym KF1

Negative

Aym MF2

Negative

Aym KF2

Negative

Cm MF1

Negative

Cm KF1

Positive

Cm MF2

Negative

Cm KF2

Negative

Atm MF1

Negative

Atm KF1

Negative

Atm MF2

Positive

Atm KF2

Negative

Bm MF1

Negative

Bm KF1

Positive

Bm MF2

Negative

Bm KF2

Negative

CMF

Negative

CKF

Negative

Table 6: Coliform Count on Samples.

1.       Aworh OC (2008The Role of Traditional Food Processing Technologies In National Development : the West African Experience. University of Ibadan.

2.       Scudamore KA (2005) Identifying Mycotoxins is Paramount in the fight against their spreadJ world Grain 23: 36-39.

3.       Egbuta MA, Mwanza M, Njobeh PB, Phoku JZ, Chilaka CA, et al. (2015) Isolation of Filamentous Fungi Species Contaminating Some Nigerian Food Commodities. Journal of Food Research 4: 38-50.

4.       Doolotkeldieva TD(2010) Microbiological Control of Flour-Manufacture: Dissemination of Mycotoxins Producing Fungi in CereaProducts. Microbiology Insite 3: 1-15.

5.       University North Dakota State (2014) Flour Analysis-NDSU Wheat Quality & Carbohydrate Research.

6.       Robert A, Ellen S, Jens C, Ole F (1995) Introduction to food-borne fungi (4thed.). The Netherlands: Centraal bureau voor Schimmel cultures.

7.       Lokko GP (1978) Aflatoxin contamination of cassava flour (kokonte) processed by traditional methods in Ghana. University of Ghana 1-93.

8.       FDA (2015) Safe Practices for Food Processes - Evaluation and Definition of Potentially Hazardous Foods-Chapter 3. Factors that Influence Microbial Growth. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

9.       African Organization for Standardization (2012) ARS 838: Cassava flour --Specification -ars.838.2012.pdf. https://law.resource.org/pub/ars/ibr/ars.838.2012.pdf (Accessed on January 24, 2016)

10.    Lu JY, Pace RPlahar W (1988) A Research Note Survey of the Microbial Quality of Dry Fish, Cassava and Okra in Ghana. Journal of Food Protection 51: 660-662.

11.    Adu-Gyamfi A, Appiah(2012) Enhancing the Hygienic Quality of Some Ghanaian Food Products by Gamma Irradiation. Food and Nutrition Sciences 3: 219-223.

12.    Victor N,Bekele MS, Ntseliseng M, Makotoko M, Peter C, et al.(2013) Microbial and Physicochemical Characterization of Maize and Wheat Flour from a Milling Company, Lesotho. International Journal of Food Safety 15: 11-19.

13.    OGorman CM, Fuller HT, Dyer PS (2009) Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature 457: 471-474.

14.    Fung F, Clark RF (2004) Health effects of mycotoxins: a toxicological overview. Journal of Toxicology Clinical Toxicology 42: 217-234.

© by the Authors & Gavin Publishers. This is an Open Access Journal Article Published Under Attribution-Share Alike CC BY-SA: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License. With this license, readers can share, distribute, download, even commercially, as long as the original source is properly cited. Read More About Open Access Policy.

International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research

Update cookies preferences