Filamentous Fungi inSelectedProcessed Indigenous Flours Soldin, Kumasi, Ghana
Benjamin Tetteh Awaitey1, Felix CMills-Robertson2*
2DepartmentofBiochemistry andBiotechnology,KwameNkrumahUniversity ofScienceand Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Citation:Awaitey BT, Milk-Robertson FC (2017) Filamentous Fungi in Selected Processed Indigenous Flours Sold in, Kumasi, Ghana. Food Nutr J: FDNJ-146.
1.
Abstract
This study evaluated the filamentous fungi present inselected locall processed indigenous flour sold in the Kumasi Metropolisof Ghana usingstandard microbiologicalmethods.Resultsfrom thisstudy showedthatdrycassava(kokonte)flourrecordedmouldcountrangingfrom1.70×103±0.15cfu/gto4.03×105±0.35cfu/gwhilemaizeflourhadmouldcountrangingfromno observablegrowthcountto1.18×106±0.18cfu/g.Totalplatecountshowedcontamination levelsbetweennoobservablegrowthcountto9.1×106±0.25cfu/gforthe maizefloursamples, whileforthedrycassava(kokonte)flour,countsrangedfrom7.8×103±0.30cfu/gto4.64×106± 3.18 cfu/g. Moistureanalysis revealed percentagemoisture content of 12.4%±0.15 to 19.7% ± 0.12forthemaizefloursamplesand10.9%±0.27to16.9%±0.56fordry cassava(kokonte) flour.Coliformstestindicatednegativeforsevenofeight(7/8)maizefloursamplesandsixout ofeight(6/8)fordry cassava (kokonte)floursamplesboughtfromthevariousmarkets.Fromthe study,thirteenmouldspeciesbelongingtofivegenerawere isolated fromthevariousflour samples.Tendifferentspecies were isolatedfromthedry cassava(kokonte)flourwhilethirteen different varieties from the five generawereisolated from the maize flour.
1.
Introduction
Thehighincidenceofpost-harvestfoodlosses,arisingmainlyduetoinadequatefoodstorage andpreservationtechnologies,isamajorissueaffectingthequalityoffoodinWestAfrica, whereseasonalfoodshortagesanddiseasesresultingfromnutritionaldeficiency arestillamajor concern[1].Studyhasshownthatfruits,vegetables,rootsandtuberscontributetonearly50%of perishablefood commoditieswhile grainssuchasmaize,sorghum,millet,riceandcowpeas contributetoabout30%offoodlossafterharvestinWestAfrica[1].Factorsthatcontributeto theselossesmay include;inappropriatefoodprocessingtechnologies,poorharvestingand inefficientpost-harvesthandlingpractices,badroads,moribundrailsystemsandmanyothers [1].
InGhana,issuesofpost-harvestlossesarepredominantespecially wherelocally producedcrops suchascassava,yam,maize,rice,beans,andothersarehardlyprocessedleadingtowasteof cropsespecially duringbumperharvest.Inordertoextendtheshelf-lifeofsomeofthesecrops andhencereducetheincidenceofpostharvestlosses,they areprocessedintofloursandother productswhichmaybeusedby individualsathomeorsoldoncommercialbasis.Methods involvedinprocessingthese indigenousfoodstuffsmay,however,exposethemtocontamination by severalpathogensmainlyfilamentousfungiandsomebacteriainadditiontocontamination from thefarm beforeprocessing. Forinstance, most cereal grains can becontaminated by differentspeciesofmicroscopic fungusduringitdevelopmentalstages[2]andthese pathogens mayaffect thecrop resulting in a reduction ofthequalityof thegrain.
Somespeciesmay producemycotoxinsthatintoxicatebothhumansandanimalupon consumption[2].Mycotoxinclassesknownto occur incereals,includingtheaflatoxins(AFB1, AFB2andAFG1,G2),tricotecens,deoxinivalenol(DON)and(T-2toxin),the fumonisins(FB1, FB2andFB3),thezearalenone(ZON),ochratoxinA(OTA)andtheergotalkaloids[3]are knowntobecarcinogenic.Studieshaverevealedthatmajority ofthesemycotoxinsareproduced bythe genuses Aspergillus, Penicilliumand Fusariu[3].
Threedifferentmediaforthecultivationoffungi; PotatoDextroseAgar(PDA),Oxytetracycline- GlucoseYeastExtractAgar(OGY)andDichloranRoseBengalChlortetracyclineAgar(DRBC) (eachcontaining100mg/L ofchloramphenicol)wereusedfortheisolationofthemoulds.From theprepareddilutions,0.1mloftheinoculumwasinoculatedontothedifferentmediaby the spread platemethod andthe plates incubatedat 25°Cfor5 to 7 days.
Analysiswasdone intriplicatesinorder tominimize the error marginasmuch aspossible. ResultsobtainedweretabulatedintoMicrosoftExcel2010andforeasy interpretation,thedata was subjected to one-wayAnalysis of Variance (ANOVA) and the significance differences betweenthemeansofthevariousmarketsdetermined by usingStatisticalPackageforSocial Sciences (SPSSversion 20). P-values ≥ 0.05 were considered as statisticallynot significant.
Theaveragemoisturecontentofthemaizefloursamplesrangedfrom12.37%±0.15to19.70% ±0.12whilethatofcassavaflourrangedfrom10.93%±0.27to16.90%±0.56asshownin Table1.Themoisturecontentobtainedforthevariouskokontefloursamplesisinagreement withthestudy result(10.0%to16.9%)reported byLokko,(1978).Severalresearcheshavebeen conducted toestablishanacceptablemoisturecontentofkokonteflour. Reportsshow thatfora kokonteflour toremainstable,a moisture contentof 12% isrequired[7].Apartfromsamples bought from Atonso market (AtmKF1 andAtm KF2) and thecontrol (CKF) which recorded valueslowerthan12%,theremainingsampleshadmoisturecontents higher than12%.This suggeststhatthehighmoisturecontentmay beacontributoryfactortomicrobialcontamination sincestudieshaveshownthatmicroorganismsrequiremoisturefortheirgrowth[8]. Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between moisture content and mould count of dry cassava(kokonte) flour.Thoughhighmoisturecontentinfoodsisknowntobe a stronginfluence for growthofmicroorganisms,theresultsforthemoisture contentofAtmKF1,AtmKF2and CKFfromthisstudysuggestthatotherfactorsapartfromthehighmoisturecontentmay account forthe contamination in the samples.
3.2. EnumerationofMoulds
Resultsfor theenumerationofmouldsinthesampleshavebeenrepresentedinTable2.Forthe dry cassava(kokonte)flour,allthesampleswerecontaminatedwithmoulds,representing100% mouldscontamination,butthelevelsofcontaminationvariedamongthesamples.The levelofmouldcontaminationamongthesamplesexceededtheacceptablemouldslevelinfood(103cfu/g)asreportedby AfricanOrganizationfor Standardization[9].Thisis anindicationthatthe drycassava(kokonte)floursoldonthevariousmarketsmaybeunwholesomeand,therefore, pose healthrisktoconsumers.Incomparingtheresultsfor mouldcountinthe variouskokonteflour,withresultsobtainedbyLuetal.[10],all the samplesrecordedcounthigher than6.5×103cfu/gasthey reportedintheirstudiesexceptforthesamplesfromVendor-2inBantamamarket (BmKF2)whichrecorded1.70×103±0.15cfu/g.The controlsamplealsorecordedcountlower than reported. Statisticalanalysisshoweda significantdifference betweenthe countsatp<0.05. Enumerationofmouldsinthe maize floursamplesrevealedvaryingdegree ofcontamination among thesamplesranging from no observablemould count as recorded byAtm MF1, BmMF1, BmMF2andCMFtohighcountof1.18×106±0.18cfu/gasrecordedby CmMF1.Samples fromAymMF2,CmMF2andAtmMF2showedcountsthatwerealittlehigherthanthe tolerablelevelof103cfu/g,recording1.67×103±0.30cfu/g,3.40×103±0.30cfu/gand2.97× 103±0.30cfu/g,respectively.Extremelylowcountsofmouldinthesamplesasrecordedby AtmMF1, BmMF1, BmMF2and CMFis inagreementwithresultsobtained byAdu-Gyamfi andAppiah[11],obtainingmouldcountof5.0×101cfu/g.Thelowcountofmouldsreported may beduetothedehullingofgrainsbeforeprocessingintoflourasreportedbyVictoretal.[12].Itisthoughtthatthemicroorganismsareusually foundontheoutercoatofthegrainsand hencedehullingisameansofreducingcontamination.Theextentofcontaminationinsamples for Aym MF1 and Cm MF1, however, suggests that the dehulling process may not be a guaranteethatsamplesareabsolutely freefromcontaminants.Thehighincidenceof contaminationinthesesamplesmay beattributedtofactorssuchasthehighmoisturecontentof thefloursamples,thelength/periodthesampleshavebeenonmarket,theprocessingmethod,the hygienic practices employed in processing, and the conditions under which the food commodities weresold on the market.
3.3. Identificationofmoulds
Mouldsbelongingtofivegenera wereisolatedandidentifiedfromboth themaizeflourandthe dry cassava(kokonte)flour.Thedifferent generaincludedCladosporium,Aspergillus,Mucor, RhizopusandPenicillium(Figure 1).Tables3and4,showthedifferentorganismsisolatedfrom thevariousfloursamplesfromthedifferentmarkets.Thesefindingsarecontrary tothatofLuet al.,[10]whoisolatedonly two genera;AspergillusandPenicilliumfromtheirsamples.Themost predominantorganisms isolatedfromthedry cassava(kokonte)flourwereAspergillusflavus, RhizopusstoloniferandMucorhiemaliswhilethatforthemaize flour werePenicillium crustosum,Rhizopusstolonifer,CladosporiumcladosporioidesandAspergilluswentii. The prevalenceoftheseorganismsinthevariousfloursamplesmaybeduetotheubiquitousnature oftheirsporesasmentionedbyO’Gormanetal.[13].Studieshaveshownthatsomeofthese mouldsproducemycotoxinswhichare knowntobeteratogenic,mutagenic,hepatotoxic, genotoxicandhepatocarcinogenicdependingonhowlonganindividualgetsexposedtothe toxin [14].
3.4. Total Plate count
Resultsfromthetotal platecountisanimportantindicationofthehygienicconditions surrounding the foodandalso shows theeffectiveness andefficiencyofthefood chain process as wellas the shelf lifeof the food[12].In this study,the total plate countfrom thekokontesamples werehigher(Table5)thanthatreportedbyLuetal. [10]whorecorded16×103cfu/g.Only samplesfromVendor-2inBantama market(BmKF2)andthe ControlKokonteFlour (CKF) recording7.8×103±0.30cfu/gand5.63×103±0.45cfu/g,respectively,werealittle lowerthan theresultsobtained byLuetal.[10]. Formostofthesamples,thelevelofcontaminationwas foundtobehigherthantherecommendedlevel(105cfu/g)andthisisanindicationofpoor sanitationorproblemsresultingfromtheprocesscontrolorhandlingoftherawmaterial[12]. Forthemaizefloursamples,exceptforsamplesfromBantamamarketVendor-1(BmMF1) whichdidnotrecordany growthfortotalplatecount,theremainingsamplesrecordedcounts whichexceededthe tolerable level.Thisisanindicationthatfavourable conditionsexistwithin the flour to support thegrowth of various organisms.
3.5. ColiformCount
Mostof the samplestestednegative for coliformsexceptfor maize floursample boughtfrom Vendor-2fromAtonsomarket(AtmMF2),dry cassava (kokonte)flour boughtfromtheCentral market Vendor-1(Cm KF1) andkokonteflourbought from Vendor-1(Bm KF1) (Table 6). Resultsfromcoliformtest,whichisanindicatorof personalhygienelevelof flour sellers[12], suggestthatthehighlevelofcontaminationmaynotnecessarily beasaresultofpoorhygiene practices by floursellersbutotherfactorssuchascontaminationduringharvestandstorageof cereal as mentioned byVictor et al.[12].
4.
Conclusion
|
MARKETS |
|||||
|
FLOUR SAMPLES |
Aym |
Cm |
Atm |
Bm |
Control |
|
MF1 |
15.07±0.19c |
14.03±0.18b |
13.87±0.12b |
13.23±0.09ab |
12.37±0.15a |
|
MF2 |
13.33±0.37ab |
19.70±0.12d |
13.10±0.25ab |
15.50±0.15c |
|
|
KF1 |
12.57±0.34b |
14.67±0.23c |
10.93±0.27a |
15.00±0.06c |
11.70±0.17a |
|
KF2 |
13.03±0.29b |
16.90±0.56d |
11.03±0.23a |
13.00±0.15b |
|
|
Key:Aym - Ayigya market, Cm - Central market, Atm - Atonso market, Bm - Bantama market, CMF - Control Maize Flour, KF- kokonte flour, MF- maize flour, C-control sample, 1 and 2 - Vendors 1 and 2 from the same market. For the same flour sample, means that do not share the same letter (superscript) were significantly different (P<0.05) but those that share the same letter (superscript) do not differ significantly (P>0.05) |
|||||
Table 1: Percentage Moisture Contents of the Maize and Cassava Flour samples.
|
MARKETS |
||||||
|
FLOUR SAMPLES |
Aym |
Cm |
Atm |
Bm |
Control |
|
|
MF1 |
3.03×105±0.96a |
1.18×106±0.18b |
NILa |
NILa |
NILa |
|
|
MF2 |
1.67×103±0.30a |
3.40×103±0.17a |
2.97×103±0.30a |
NILa |
|
|
|
KF1 |
1.08×104±0.25c |
3.20×104±0.32c |
1.77×104±0.18c |
1.43×104±0.18c |
TFTC |
|
|
KF2 |
1.90×105±0.25d |
4.03×105±0.35e |
7.03×104±0.61c |
1.70×103±0.15c |
|
|
|
Key: TFTC- Too Few to Count, NIL – No mould count. Aym - Ayigya market, Cm - Central market, Atm - Atonso market, Bm - Bantama market, CMF - Control Maize Flour, KF- kokonte flour, MF- maize flour, C-control sample, 1 and 2 - Vendors 1 and 2 from the same market. For the same flour sample, means that do not share the same letter (superscript) were significantly different (P<0.05) but those that share the same letter (superscript) do not differ significantly (P>0.05) |
||||||
Table 2: Load of Moulds on the Samples (cfu/g).
|
FLOUR SAMPLE |
ORGANISM ISOLATED |
|
Aym MF1 |
Mucor racemosis, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus wentii, Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus versicolor, Cladosporium herbarum, Penicillium crustosum, Penicillium camemberti |
|
Aym MF2 |
Aspergillus ochraceus, Aspergillus wentii, Aspergillus fumigatus, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Penicillium crustosum |
|
Cm MF1 |
Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium crustosum, Mucor racemosis, |
|
Cm MF2 |
Aspergillus flavus, Rhizopus stolonifer, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus wentii, |
|
Atm MF1 |
No observable growth recorded |
|
Atm MF2 |
Mucor hiemalis, Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium crustosum, Penicillium viridicatum |
|
Bm MF1 |
No observable growth recorded |
|
Bm MF2 |
No observable growth recorded |
|
CMF |
No observable growth recorded |
|
Key: Aym MF1-maize flour from vendor 1 at Ayigya market, Aym MF2- maize flour from vendor 2 at Ayigya market, Cm MF1-maize flour from vendor1 at central market, Cm MF2-maize flour from vendor2 at central market, Atm MF1- maize flour from vendor1 at Atonso market, Atm MF2- maize flour form vendor2 at Atonso market, Bm MF1- maize flour from vendor 1 at Bantama market, Bm MF2- maize flour from vendor 2 at Bantama Market, CMF- control maize flour. |
|
Table 3: Identified Moulds on the Maize Flour from the Different Markets.
|
FLOUR SAMPLE |
ORGANISM ISOLATED |
|
Aym KF1 |
Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus wentii |
|
Aym KF2 |
Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium crustosum, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus wentii |
|
Cm KF1 |
Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium crustosum, Cladosporium cladosporioides |
|
Cm KF2 |
Rhizopus stolonifer, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus wentii, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor racemosis, |
|
Atm KF1 |
Aspergillus flavus, Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucor hiemalis, Penicillium viridicatum |
|
Atm KF2 |
Aspergillus flavus, Mucor racemosis, Mucor hiemalis, Rhizopus stolonifer |
|
Bm KF1 |
Mucor hiemalis, Rhizopus stolonifer, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium viridicatum, Aspergillus versicolor, Aspergillus fumigatus |
|
Bm KF2 |
Aspergillus fumigatus, Mucor hiemalis, Mucor racemosis Rhizopus stolonifer |
|
CKF |
Cladosporium cladosporioides, Penicillium crustosum, |
|
Key: Aym KF1-kokonte flour from vendor 1 at Ayigya market, Aym KF2- kokonte flour from vendor 2 at Ayigya market, Cm KF1-kokonte flour from vendor1 at Central market, Cm KF2-kokonte flour from vendor 2 at Central market, Atm KF1- kokonte flour from vendor1 at Atonso market, Atm KF2- kokonte flour form vendor 2 at Atonso market, Bm KF1- kokonte flour from vendor 1 at Bantama market, Bm KF2- kokonte flour from vendor 2 at Bantama market, CKF- control kokonte flour |
|
Table 4: Identified Moulds on the Dry Cassava (kokonte) Flour from the Different Markets.
|
MARKET |
|||||
|
FLOUR SAMPLE |
Aym |
Cm |
Atm |
Bm |
Control |
|
MF1 |
5.5 ×104±0.62a |
4.02 ×105±3.05a,b |
3.4 ×103±0.62a |
NILa |
4.37×103±0.83a |
|
MF2 |
6.4×105±0.30a,b |
8.7 ×104±0 .96a |
9.1 ×106±0.25c |
3.42×106±2.52b |
|
|
KF1 |
3.3×106±2.41e |
6.4 ×105±0.78e |
4.43 ×106±3.03e |
4.33 ×105±3.35e |
5.63 ×103±0.45e |
|
KF2 |
4.6 ×105±0.62e |
4.64 ×106±3.18e |
3.76 ×106±2.69e |
7.8 ×103±0.30 |
|
Table 5: Total Plate Count (cfu/g) of Organisms Isolated from Both Flour Samples.
|
Sample |
Test result |
Sample |
Test results |
|
Aym MF1 |
Negative |
Aym KF1 |
Negative |
|
Aym MF2 |
Negative |
Aym KF2 |
Negative |
|
Cm MF1 |
Negative |
Cm KF1 |
Positive |
|
Cm MF2 |
Negative |
Cm KF2 |
Negative |
|
Atm MF1 |
Negative |
Atm KF1 |
Negative |
|
Atm MF2 |
Positive |
Atm KF2 |
Negative |
|
Bm MF1 |
Negative |
Bm KF1 |
Positive |
|
Bm MF2 |
Negative |
Bm KF2 |
Negative |
|
CMF |
Negative |
CKF |
Negative |
Table 6: Coliform Count on Samples.
2.
Scudamore KA (2005) Identifying Mycotoxins is Paramount in the fight against their
spread. J world Grain 23: 36-39.
5.
University North
Dakota
State (2014) Flour Analysis-NDSU Wheat Quality & Carbohydrate Research.
6.
Robert A, Ellen S, Jens C, Ole F (1995) Introduction to food-borne fungi (4thed.). The Netherlands: Centraal
bureau
voor Schimmel cultures.
9.
African Organization for Standardization (2012) ARS 838: Cassava flour --Specification -ars.838.2012.pdf. https://law.resource.org/pub/ars/ibr/ars.838.2012.pdf (Accessed on January 24, 2016)
12.
Victor N,Bekele MS, Ntseliseng M, Makotoko M, Peter
C, et al.(2013) Microbial
and Physicochemical Characterization of Maize
and Wheat Flour from
a Milling Company,
Lesotho.
International Journal of Food
Safety 15: 11-19.

research article